Non- Agricultural Permissions
By Accommodation Times News Service
It is the Permission granted for conversion of agricultural use for various non agricultural uses for the land assessed on used for agricultural purpose. In a simplified version it is just the “CHANGE IN USE” of the land. If the land is assessed or held for the purpose of agricultural it cannot be used for any other non agricultural purpose without permission.
For clear perception it is imperative to study relevant definitions of some of the vital terms like (1) “Agriculture” (2) “Agricultural land” and (3) Agricultural purposes.
Surpassingly the terms “Agriculture” is not defined in the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 But it is defined in section 2 (1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.
Agriculture is not only ploughing, sowing and reaping of some crops or produce. Its agricultural uses includes, grazing for cattle, breeding of live stock, poultry farming, rabmanure, beekeeping, manure storage etc. Thus the land which is used or capable of being used for the purpose of agriculture can be termed as “Agricultural Land”.
The procedure to obtain permission for conversion of use of land from one purpose to another is very lengthy and requires professional expertise in the field of revenue laws. The permission is granted under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 44 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue (conversion of use of land and N.A Assessment) Rules, 1969 to the competent authority having respective jurisdiction of either Tahsildar or the Sub-Divisional Officer or the Collector as the case may be. The application in the prescribed form as mentioned aforesaid can be made by an occupant or a superior holder or tenant with the consent of each other. But the practice of constituted attorney applying on behalf of the landholder is unlawful. On one of the four prescribed forms the applicant must annex one rupee court fee stamp. The applicant can apply for nonagricultural permission for any one of the three stipulations mention there under; (a) to change the use of land assessed or held for the purpose of agricultural for a nonagricultural purpose (b) To change the use of land held or assessed for nonagricultural purpose for some another nonagricultural purpose (c) To use the land for the same nonagricultural purpose for which it is assessed but in relaxation of any of the conditions imposed at the time of grant of land or permission for such nonagricultural purpose.
The case can be processed only if the submission is substantiated with various documents as under:-
(A) 7/12 or record or rights of the proposed lands in original x 4 copies.
(b) 6 –A Mutation entries in originals x each 4 copies.
(c) 8 – A Khate Utara in original x each 4 copies.
(d) GutBook plan of the concerned land issued & Certified by the District Inspector of land records x 4 copies.
(e) Certified Measurement plan of the land survey form District Inspector of land records x 4 copies.
(f) Layout plan showing internal roads, open spaces etc duly signed by the applicant and the Architect x 8 copies.
(g) Registration Certificate of the Architect x 2 copies.
(h) Appointment Letter for the Architect x 1 copies
(i) Complete revenue search for at least 30 years x 4 sets.
(j) Power of Attorney for the constituted Attorney if appointed by the landholders x 2 copies.
(k) Grant in right of way document if access road is obtained from the adjoining owners x 2 copies.
(l) N.A. application in prescribed form x 4 copies.
(m) N.O.C. from local authority for conversion of land uses x 2 copies.
(n) N.O.C. from pollution Board for Industrial N.A.
(o) N.O.C. from Land Acquisition Department.
(p) Authentic documents to prove existence of adequate water source.
(q) Provisions to be adopted for sewage, drainage and disposal system.
(r) Provisions for adequate infrastructure in the case of vast layouts.
(s) “Sales Permission” for tenanted lands under layout.
The application can be returned back if the applicant is unauthorized signatory or if the submission is incomplete for want of some documents. The competent Revenue Authority (The Collector, S.D.O. or Tahsildar as the case may be) will initiate proper inquiry through Circle officer of the area for on the spot study of the site to verify the applicants and inspect the site in detail. His report will include written statement endorsed by the applicant and the Architect. The positive site inspection report from the Circle Officer should confirm that the land is vacant and there is no structure. He shall also note the alignment of high tension electrical lines passing above the lands. Any dispute regarding ownership of the land will come to surface during joint site inspection of the site by the Circle Officer.
During the process of granting permission for nonagricultural use complete revenue record of the concerned land shall be thoroughly scrutinized and the permission can never be granted if discrepancies are detected in earlier transfers of occupancy.
If a fraud is detected in previous transfers it shall be construed that all the subsequent transfers thereafter are invalid. However irregularities in areas can be rectified by actual survey on site through D.I.L.R. and other ways.
The competent authority i.e. the Collector or the Sub – Divisional Officer or the Tahsildar as the case may be will forward the case papers to the relevant planning authority of the area such as Asst. Director of Town Planning (A.D.T.P.) or BM.R.ED.A. Or CIDCO etc. for recommendation whether the proposed nonagricultural use can be allowed or not?
The concerned Planning Authority shall scrutinize the case in detail to ascertain if all the stipulated Development Control Rules are followed or not and shall base their report on the following assertions viz
(1) Security of Public Health (2) Contradiction of planned scheme of the area (3) Contradiction of planned scheme of the area (4) Balanced Development (5) Area verifications (6) Availability of infrastructure (7) proposed infrastructure in the schemes etc. At this juncture it is interesting to state that competent Revenue Authority is sufficiently authorized to sanction N.A. Permission in spite of having some objections from the Planning Authority. The consultation of the Planning Authority is mandatory but the final decision under discretionary powers is with the Competent Authority. In various cases, sometimes Planning Authority is too rigid to apprehend the substance of Planning Concept in relation with the vicinity around and the needs of the people by raising non-practical and vogue objections. The applicant is eligible to refer his case in Appeal to the Direct of town Planning Office for Maharashtra in Pune, if the case is rejected. In such cases till the final decision is arrived the application for N.A shall remain pending.
The case papers shall also be forward to the Land Acquisition Department to verify that the proposed lands under N.A. are not included in the Land Acquisition by the Government; if so N.A. Permission can never be granted.
For Industrial N.A. use case papers shall also go to various Government officers for verification regarding protection form air and water pollution and ecology. If the proposed land in full or part is obtained under “The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, obtaining of “Sale Permission” from the competent Authority is an absolute must before granting N.A. Permission. Let me raise a point here that procurement of sale permission in itself is a vast subject and requires tremendous professional expertise and knowledge of the prevalent land enactments. The position of tribal lands is very ambiguous. All occupancies of Tribal transferred in favor of non tribal after 6th July 1974 shall be liable for prosecution under the Maharashtra Land (Amendment) Act, 1974 or generally known as Maharashtra Act XXXV of 1974. Similarly all the transfers and adiwasi lands to non-tribal affected during the period from 1st April 1957 to 6th July 1974 shall be read with according the to “The Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to scheduled Tribals act, 1975 which is known as Maharashtra Act No. xiv of 1975. But however the non tribal transferee can succeed if the land in question has been put to any non agricultural use on or before the 6th July 1974. It is generally believed that if no reply is given by the Authority to the Applicant within 90 days from the date of acknowledgement of the application the N.A. permission shall be deemed to have been granted. If all conditions are fulfilled under section 44(3) of the M.L.R.C. 1966, the permission is deemed to have been granted. It is not in reality granted but the Act of Legislature treats that it is granted. The applicant is not liable to any fine or penalty under section 45.
The levy of Non Agricultural assessment begins from the day on which nonagricultural use begins and not from the date of permission. The commencement of N.A. use is not elaborated in the Code. But it is a question of fact and interpretation. The applicant should sincerely exert himself after obtaining N.A. Permission by operations like leveling, developing or reclaiming the land, Constructing internal roads, drainage etc., thus altering the outlook of the land so as to render it unsuitable for agriculture. The above operations are adequate to establish that N.A. use has commenced. It is not necessary that Building construction activity shall not started to commence N.A. use.
If the applicant fails to inform within one month his commencement of N.A. use he shall be liable to pay fine in addition to N.A. Assessment but such fine shall not exceed Rs. Five Hundred only as per section 44 (5) of the code.
The applicant shall be commence that non agricultural use applied for within one year from the date of the order; failing which, unless the said period is extended by the Collector from time to time, the permission granted shall be deemed to have lapsed as per rule 4 (c) of the M.L.R. (Concretion of use of land and nonagricultural assessment) rules, 1969.
As per section 44(6) of the code after the change in land use sand shall be granted to the holder in the form in schedule IV if the land is situated outside the jurisdiction of the Planning Authority and in Schedule V if the land is situated within the jurisdiction of the Planning Authority. If the applicant fails to appear before the Collector for execution of sanad within a reasonable time, a notice can be issued to him to the effect that such act of non execution of sanad would entail cancellation of N.A. permission already granted. The Government is no authorized to alter very or cancel the terms and conditions of a sanad once they are agreed upon between the Government and the occupant, as the sanad is executed by the Collector on behalf of the Governor under Article 299 of the Constitution and it constitutes a contractual obligation. But if the sanad is executed by the collector in his capacity as a revenue officer in exercise of his statutory obligation in favor of private parties; thus Government of revenue officers are empowered to vary; amend or cancel the terms and conditions of the sanad. Conversion of agricultural use into nonagricultural use without permission is bad in law but a nonagricultural land may be used for agricultural purpose without any permission unless such agricultural use is prohibited under section 43 of M.L.R. Code 1966.
The Collector is bound to give reasons in writing of refusal of N.A. Permission under section 42 of the code to the applicant. On refusal the applicant is entitled for only ONE appeal under section 247 of the code to the Divisional Commissioner.
The Government has power Su motto to revise orders passed by the collator for some specific cause involving public interest even if sanad is executed creating contractual obligation .In such a case the Aggrieved party is liable to get appropriate compensation against the cost incurred in setting up the project by commencing N.A. use.
The Regularization of unauthorized use is covered by rule 9 f the Maharashtra Land Revenue (conversion of use of land Non Agricultural Assessment) Rules 1969. For unauthorized use of land in contravention of the provisions of section 44 of the code if the Collector is satisfied that had the holder applied for necessary permission under relevant section his application would have been sanctioned and if it is within the jurisdiction of the planning Authority the unauthorized non agricultural use can be regularized under rule 9 of the following conditions:
(i) The holder shall pay the amount of conversion tax leviable under section 47A within 30 days from the date of regularization and shall pay non agricultural assessment from the very commencement of the use. (ii) The holder shall pay fine not exceeding forty times the N.A. Assessment. (iii) That the holder shall abide by the conditions specified in Rule 4 and such other conditions as the Collector may deem fit to impose.
However if the unauthorized N.A. use is not possible to be regularized under Rule 9 as described above, and if the Collector is convinced planning Authority with the sanction of the State Government may allow the constructions to remain under Rule10 subject to the conditions (i) and (iii) in preceding rule 9 and with additional conditions as follows :
(a) Holder to pay composition fee not less than fifty percent of the cost incurred on the offending unauthorized construction or 40 time the N.A. as-assessment payable on the land with reference to the altered use, whichever is greater and (b) the holder shall agree in writing to demolish the offending unauthorized construction without claiming compensation whenever asked to do so in the public interest, failing which the Collector shall do so at the holder risk and costs.
In exceptional cases the Collector may with the sanction of the State Government reduce the amount of composition fee payable by the holder under conditions (a) of Rule 10 as enumerated here in above if the Collector is convinced about (i) the financial inability of the holder causing him undue hardship and (ii) if the offending unauthorized construction was no constructed by the holder with the knowledge that it was unauthorized. The holder is eligible for the grant of a sanad from the Collector if his unauthorized non-agricultural use is permitted to be continued under Rule 9 or 10 of the “The Maharashtra Land Revenue” (conversion of use to of land under Non agricultural Assessments) Rules, 1969.
There is one more procedure for the regularization of unauthorized non agricultural use. Under the Collector of Thane’s notification No. REV DESK II/N.A. XI 124 dated 27/09/1978 (N.A.) in various talukas who shall issue provisional N.A. order under Section 45 and 114 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code demanding the holder to pay N.A. Assessment and fine (40 times of Assessment). But simply paying of N.A. Assessment and fine does not regularize unauthorized N.A. use. Usually the period of six months is granted to the holder to bring
N.O.C. from the Planning Authority and other authorities, failing which the holder is liable to be prosecuted in accordance to the provisions of M.C.R. code 1966 inclusive of the demolition of his structure. The substance behind this procedure is to raise revenue from unauthorized structures and to give constitutional rights to the holder to prove his bonafides that permission may have been obtained if applied before as he was ignorant of the offence he had committed deliberately by flouting all the prevailing rules it is not possible for the holder to get his unauthorized N.A. use regularized under section 47(b) of the M.L.R. Code 1966. Therefore the layman buying part of such unauthorized structure should not be misguided by the grantor of this provisional order of the Additional Tehsildar (N.A.). Such orders are not final N.A. orders.
On receiving N.A. Order the valuation of the property increased manifold. The procedure is intriguing and cumbersome. It invites precise professional expertise. It adds significantly to the credentials of the property as it is a certification from the Government with regards to its immaculate legal and revenue marketable title. Any Indian Citizen in Indian Union inclusive of Andaman and Nicobar but exclusive of Jammu and Kashmir can buy and N.A. property anywhere even if he is not an agriculturist.
photo representations of land acquisition disputes all over India