MahaRERA directs builder to hand over projects 9 years before deadline

MUMBAI Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) settled a conflict over non-payment of dues in an ongoing housing project in Andheri. Authority directed two flat buyers to pay the maximum amount of the flat and asked builder to hand over the project nine years before the time limit. Nisar Realtors, a builder,

Section 88: The complainant wants to withdraw from the project and claims his amount with interest and compensation

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi, LLB, Ph.D. Mr.Kutbuddinllussscinbhai Lokhanclwala V/s Reliance Enterprises (CC006000000001634) Order dated: 4th April 2018 The complainant has filed this complaint u/s. 18 of Real Estate Regulation and Development, Act 2016 (RERA). He contends that he and his wife booked Apartment. This apartment is in the sale component of the

Reason beyond the control of Promoter, due to which the completion of the project has got delayed, not maintainable

Are Commercial units covered under RERA? By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi, LLB, Ph.D. Hitesh Parthviraj Mehta V/s Point Developers Pvt. Ltd (CC006000000001226) Order dated: 8th January 2018 The Complainant has purchased a commercial unit bearing no. 5 in the respondent s project 'Business point' located at Chembur, Mumbai through an agreement for sale dated

Registered Agreement for sale good enough for refund if possession not given as mentioned in Agreement

A promoter cannot hide behind excuses of litigations because of his own wrongdoing. By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi, LLB, Ph.D. Ajit Rasiklal Sanghvi V/s Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd (CC005000000001502) Order dated: 16th March 2018 The complainants have filed this complaint to get refund of their amount with interest and/or compensation paid by them

Will change in carpet area or possession date attract Section 12?

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Vaibhav Singh V/s Radius & Deserve Builders LLP (CC006000000001159) Order dated: 7th March 2018 The complainant claims his amount with interest and/or compensation under Section 12 of The Real Estate (Development and Regulation) Act, 2016 from the respondents as the respondents changed the date of the

Member of a Society, although not party to Development Agreement, cannot be treated as Allottee

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Smt. Vimla Kapoor V/s M/s. Ekta Supreme Corporation (CC006000000023132) Order dated: 10th April 2018 The complainant who is members of o redevelopment society known as "Corner View CHS Ltd" has filed this complaint in the Maha RERA registered project bearing No. P51800000908 at Bandra (West), Mumbai

Builder defaults mortgage loan, stucks homebuyer in agreement for sale

The Complainants have stated in their Complaints that the builder has already handed over Possession of the row house without executing a registered agreement for sale By Rohit Sharma MUMBAI The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Maha RERA) on July 31, 2018, directed Ramnath Developers Pvt. Ltd. to execute and register the agreement

Whether the provisional Letter of Allotment issued by the respondents amounts to the Agreement for Sale? – Yes!

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, PhD Nikhil Chopra V/s JVPD Properties Pvt. Ltd. (CC005000000001348) Order Dated 5th April 2018 by Maha RERA Maha RERA observed “The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 18 to claim a refund of his amount from the respondents with interest. The respondents issued a letter dated