Acquisition of land for Re-development and Rehabilitation is prerogative of State govt: HC

By Accommodation Times News Service IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2582 OF 2003 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 267 OF 2008 Sara Harry D'Mello .. Petitioner. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. And Palatial Constructions .. Respondents. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 91 OF 2002 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 129 OF 2002 The Reserve Bank

80 IB allowable to entire project

Clause (d) inserted in section 801B[10) with effect from April 1, 2005, is prospective and not retrospective and hence could not be applied for the period prior to April 1, 2005. Since deduction under section 801B[1Oj were on the profits derived from the housing projects approved by the local authority

A recent landmark judgement by SC

By Adv. Vinod Sampat  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2544 OF 2010   Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd. ..............    Appellant  Versus  Panchali Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. …...........     Respondent  WITH  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2545 OF 2010  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2546 OF 2010  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2547 OF 2010  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2548 OF 2010  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2449 OF 2010  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2456 OF

Demolition of Illegal Constructions

In a recent case of a writ petition filed against a case of flat owners of an illegally constructed building seeking respite from the BMC’s orders, the divison Bench of the Bombay HC held that in such matters it is necessary to take into account, not only the interest of