TN RERA increased fee for complaint against promoter, project

The authority has increased fee from Rs 1,000 to Rs 1,600. The additional amount Rs 600 is to pay as postage charges. By Rohit Sharma TAMIL NADU The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TN RERA) has revised the fee for filing the complaint against the promoter/project with the authority. The authority has increased

Cheque issued under settlement under consent term, dishonoured, tantamount to Unfair Trade Practices

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Jalala Menanon V/s Ayyas Abdul Sayyed (CC006000000000827) Order by Full Bench dated: 13th December 2017 The Complainant alleges that she booked Row house No.1 in Cluster No.6, Spanish Residency situated at Naigaon. On the cancellation of the allotment, the Respondents were liable to refund her money.

Society dispute for redevelopment not tenable

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Suresh Daniel Devaral V/s United Shelters Pvt. Ltd & another (CC006000000001709) Order dated: 3rd January 2018 The Complainants in their complaint have stated that they are the members of a Co-Operative Housing Society which is taken up for redevelopment by the Builder. The Complainants alleged that

Is Purgree tenants covered under RERA?

By Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Milan Narendra Patkar V/s. Ruparel Estates India Pvt Ltd (CC005000000012120) Order dated: 22nd March 2018 The Complainant has stated that she is the tenant in respect of the office premises No. 14 in the building 'Nair Mahal' situated at Mahim, Mumbai which is being redeveloped by the

Building is already occupied and therefore is not required to be registered with Maha RERA

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Sejal Gandhi V/s Jayant Narendra Mehta (CC006000000000615) Maha RERA Oder dated 21st September 2017. The complainant alleged that the Respondent has not registered her building Kamala Vihar CHS situated at Kandivali (West) with Maha RERA, in spite of the building not having received occupancy certificate. The

Can an Allottee complain for lack of amenities if possession taken? No!

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Harish Govindram Bulchandani V/s Satra Properties (India) Ltd (CC006000000000417) Order by Maha RERA dated 27th Oct 2017 The complainant stated that he has taken the possession of the apartment on 20th April 2017 but the apartment lacks many facilities that were to be provided as agreed

Open Car Parking spaces cannot be sold, allottee eligible for parking

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi, LLB, Ph.D. Sanjeev Dharkar V/s M/s. Arkade Realty (CC006000000001135) Order dated 13th December 2017 The complainant, who is a resident in a completed building in the above-registered project, has filed this complaint seeking directions of Maha RERA to the respondent to allow him to park his vehicle inside

Whether fully constructed building without constructing common areas and without providing agreed amenities but occupied by all flat purchasers without occupancy/completion certificate as on the date of commencement of RERA, amounts to ongoing project? Yes!

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, Ph.D. Parag Pratap Mantri V/s Green Space Developers (CC0050m000000136) Order dated 5th February 2018 by Maha RERA The complainant alleges that though the respondents have not received completion certificate of E-wing/ building, they have not registered the same with Maha RERA and thereby they contravened Section 3

Whether the provisional Letter of Allotment issued by the respondents amounts to the Agreement for Sale? – Yes!

By Dr. Sanjay Chaturvedi LLB, PhD Nikhil Chopra V/s JVPD Properties Pvt. Ltd. (CC005000000001348) Order Dated 5th April 2018 by Maha RERA Maha RERA observed “The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 18 to claim a refund of his amount from the respondents with interest. The respondents issued a letter dated